Friday, April 28, 2006

Mysteries resolved 

I've recently gotten my hands on a couple of research papers that answer a couple of outstanding questions in one of my own projects. They answer them so well, in fact, that I'm not sure how much there is to say about our stuff. This is something of a shame, since I'm supposed to be speaking about it in less than 20 hours, but I suppose better now than later, right? Aside from which, saying "here's a handful of results that we're now going to apply in a completely different area of mathematics" should be worth something.

Aside from their content, the papers --- or one of them, at least --- hae also resolved for me another mystery: namely, exactly why it is that my old advisor uses the notation that he does. Whenever there's a call to create notation, you can usually count on my advisor to come up with something that's complex but complete: it covers all the bases, even if it does so in a somewhat impenetrable manner. Well, he was trained as an analyst, and from the looks of it that style of notation isn't uncommon in analysis. So in some ways trying to read one of these papers was a little like coming home, if we add the proviso that "home" is a dark and strange place where you can't find anything.

In other news, another term has ended, hurrah hurrah. Exams next week, then a few weeks of road-tripping to conferences and the like, and then something else happens. All the while, of course, I'll be working on writing and editting drafts of papers, and playing around with some new ideas, and maybe even updating more frequently. I've noticed that I've got four or five draft posts lying around that I started and then got distracted from, or couldn't find the words I was looking for, or something; maybe next week in between grading, writing, and dealing with panicked students I'll polish them up and share them with you all.


Monday, April 17, 2006

A public service announcement 

When driving at night while using your high beams, please be aware that they might blind other people on the road, and lead to their subsequent death. This should particularly be kept in mind on undivided highways.

On a related note, hovering behind someone for ten minutes with your brights fully on, only dimming them when you are approximately ten feet behind the vehicle in question, is a bad idea on several levels, mostly because it could lead to their subsequent death.

As well, when driving during a horrific rainstorm, it's possible that other people will be driving more cautiously (i.e. slower) than you. Passing them is quite acceptible, but it should be considered unwise topass them at speed and then immediately pull in front of them, as the massive wave of water then hitting their windshield could result in their subsequent death.

Thank you and good night.


Thursday, April 13, 2006

Shiny things 

Wow. There's just so many cool places to go on the internet. I wish I had some place where I could share with the world some of the neat stuff I read there.

Oh, wait.

Of course, I don't have the list handy, but via Making Light (or one of the sidebars, actually), here's a lovely little piece on food in Argentina:

Eating steaks in Argentina feels like joining a cult. You find yourself leaning on friends to come visit, and writing YOU JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND in all caps more often than feels comfortable. Argentine beef really is extraordinary.

I've been told that I need to visit Argentina for the wines; now it seems like I might stay for the steak, and that's not even beginning to touch on my intermittent fascination with Jorge Luis Borges. All of which sort of suggests that maybe I should learn Spanish someday.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?