A mathematical metaphor

I was playing around with some new ideas earlier this week; that’s usually a sign that my research brain is swinging from asleep to awake and hollering. In this case, it was prompted by my having to proctor tests without any other diversion than a pen and a pad of paper. Anyhow, in my musings I came up with sort of a neat construction. Specifically, I figured out that every simple graph can be found as an induced subgraph of some Kneser graph.

What that means for those of you who don’t do this stuff for a living: I work with graphs, which are configurations of dots and lines. That’s not much of a definition, and so it admits quite a lot; any random, irregular collection of dots, with pairs either connected by a line or not, qualifies as a graph. An induced subgraph is what you get when you take a graph and only concentrate on a part of it: some collection of dots, and any lines only involving those dots. And a Kneser graph is a highly regular, symmetrical sort of structure.

And hence: any graph, any configuration of dots and lines – no matter how arbitrary it looks, no matter how irregular – can always be seen as a small part of something ordered and balanced. Contrariwise, highly structured configurations can, when looked at closely enough, be made up of the strangest things.

And I thought that was kind of cool.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>